The behaviors and effectiveness of leaders are not  always indicative of the leadership process or style.  Situational modifiers such as task structure,  group environment, and the leader’s power position play a big role, with each  factoring into the equation of leadership effectiveness (Bass & Stogdill,  1990).  Yukl (1994) described the use of  situational modifier variables relative to leadership and the Contingency  Approach.  Fiedler’s Contingency Theory  posits that “leadership effectiveness is the result of the interaction between  the style of the leader and the characteristics of the environment in which the  leader works” (12manage, 2008).   According to Chen & Silverthorne (2005) the follower dictates the  most appropriate leader behavior. 
Relative to my personal workplace, as a business owner  our environment consists of the environment at large working in different  locations on varied job-sites and if we are working in a private residence then  the home-owner is always an independent variable that can influence and  contribute to the “culture” of the work group in either negative or positive  ways.  If we are working in a public  space then there is an even larger diverse group of people that can contribute  to the mix of the employee work group.   There are also other contractors within each job site that factor into  the equation.  Our work environment and  the group environment are always changing depending upon our location and what  other individuals might be influencing the structure.  The task structure itself is somewhat  repetitive but can change with each job site as every builder incorporates  multiple surfaces which create greater and lesser degrees of difficulty with  application.  The products used with each  job also influences task structure and difficulty level.  The abilities of employees become relevant  here as experience plays into how difficult each task may or may not be for each  individual.  Leader power position may  change as we deal with employees and also with home owners, business owners,  builders, and other stakeholders.   Leadership effectiveness on each level may vary as each of these  situational variables are always changing. However, we always strive to  communicate effectively, clarify performance expectations, and develop  supportive group relationships.
Reference:
Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of  leadership: theory, research, and managerial applications, 3rd  edition, Free Press: 
Chen, J. & Silverthorne C. (2005). Leadership  effectiveness, leadership style and employee readiness. Leadership &  Organization Development Journal. Vol. 26, Iss. ¾; p. 280
Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership in organizations,  3rd edition, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs.
12manage, 2008. Contingency Theory. Retrieved October  9, 2008 from http://www.12manage.com/methods_contingency_theory.html

No comments:
Post a Comment